Dismissed

Abdul Majeed Fazil(Faziludeen) v. Ashya Ummal Fathimathummal

Kerala HC9 Aug 2012RSA/298/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This regular second appeal before the High Court of Kerala was dismissed ex parte as the appellant was absent and represented that he had no instructions. The court noted expired respondents but proceeded to dismiss the appeal without impleadment and dismissed all pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of second appeal; dismissal of all pending interlocutory applications.

Abdul Majeed Fazil(Faziludeen) Vs Ashya Ummal… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/18TH SRAVANA 1934

¶5

RSA.NO. 298 OF 2004 ( )

¶6

AS.8/1996 OF SUB COURT, ATTINGAL OS.15/1990 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT,VARKALA

¶7

APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:

¶8

ABDUL MAJEED FAZIL (FASILUDEEN), VELLOORKONETHU PUTHEN VEEDU, MARUTHIKUNNU NAVAIKULAM DESOM AND VILLAGE FROM PLAVILA VEEDU MUTTAPPALAM DESOM, CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.SIBY MATHEW

¶10

SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR

¶11

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

¶12

1. ASHYA UMMAL FATHIMATHUMMAL, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶13

2. ASHYA UMMAL RUKKIATHUMMAL, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶14

3. ABDUL MAJEED SHAMSUDEEN, KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, NADAYARA, KANNAMBA DESOM VARKALA VILLAGE FROM PLAVILA VEEDU.

¶15

4. KASSIM PILLAI SHAHUL HAMEED, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶16

5. SHAHUL HAMEED NAZEER, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶17

R.S. A. No.298 of 2004

¶18

6. SHAHUL HAMEED RAFEEKA, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶19

7. SHAHUL HAMEED NUSAIBA, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶20

8. SHAHUL HAMEED BASHEER, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶21

9. SHAHUL HAMEED NOORJAHAN, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶22

10. SHAHUL HAMEED SHAMEENAM, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶23

11. SHAHUL HAMEED LAREEF, PLAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM DESOM CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE.

¶24

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-08-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

¶26

==================================== R.S.A. No.298 of 2004

¶27

====================================

¶28

Dated this the 09^th day of August, 2012

¶29

J U D G M E N T

¶30

The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the 3^rd respondent expired but no steps are taken for impleadment of the legal heirs, if any, so far. The the 4^th respondent also expired and the legal heirs are already on record.

¶31

It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that in spite of giving sufficient intimation to the appellant, he has not turned up. The learned counsel submits that he has no instruction from the appellant.

¶32

Appellant is absent.

¶33

Second Appeal is dismissed.

¶34

No costs.

¶35

All pending Interlocutory Applications will stand dismissed.

¶36

THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.

¶37

vsv

Abdul Majeed Fazil(Faziludeen) v. Ashya Ummal Fathimathummal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Majeed Fazil(Faziludeen) v. Ashya Ummal Fathimathummal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muraleedharan Vs Varghese

Sureshkumar Vs Vijayakumari and Others

K.P.Gopinathan Pillai Vs B.Usha

Sujatha B.Nair Vs Sukumari Amma

Purushothaman Vs Chellamma

Kadan Veettil Kunhathi Vs Vellora Vayalapra Yeshoda Amma