Raveendran P.P v. Premavally T.M
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Kerala rejected the revision petition challenging the enhancement of monthly maintenance to Rs.1,500/- from Rs.700/-, holding it was not exorbitant.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed with no merit found.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/22ND SRAVANA 1934
RPFC.No. 180 of 2012 () ----------------------IN MC.453/2011 of FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER:
RAVEENDRAN P.P S/O.LATE CHATHU NAIR, DRIVER, AGED 56 YEARS PARAMBATH PURAYIL HOUSE, CHAMPAD P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
PREMAVALLY T.M W/O.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 51 YEARS, THAYATHU MEETHAL HOUSE KAVUMBHAGAM DESOM, THIRUVANGAD AMSOM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 001.
THIS REV. PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-08-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the enhancement of monthly maintenance from Rs.700/- to Rs.1,500/- warrants judicial interference under revisional jurisdiction.
Whether the Family Court acted within its powers under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to enhance maintenance due to changed circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raveendran P.P
- respondent
Premaully T.M
Coram
C.T. Ravikumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court