Biju P.P. v. Manoja
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an order of the Family Court directing the husband to pay Rs.1,000 monthly maintenance to his wife. Finding no merit in the challenge, the court upheld the lower court's assessment based on available evidence.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; maintenance order of Family Court upheld.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/20TH MAGHA 1933
RPFC.No. 164 of 2011 ( )
-----------------------MC.NO.107/2010 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
BIJU P.P., S/O. PAVITHRAN, AGED 37 YEARS, PURAKKADAMBIL, MARAVANTHURUTHU P.O. KULASEKARAMANGALAM, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
MANOJA, D/O. VASU, AGED 34 YEARS, THERUVAKKALAYIL, IRUMBAYAM P.O., VELLOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM.PIN-686 605
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in directing the husband to pay monthly maintenance to his wife.
Whether the learned revision court is justified in dismissing the revision petition without interference.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Biju P.P.
- respondent
Manoja
Coram
P. Bhavadasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court