Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

A. Xavier Vs State Bank of Travancore — Kerala HC (2012) — LawSathi Research

Home
Kerala HC
2012
A. Xavier Vs State Bank of TravancoreA. Xavier v. State Bank of Travancore

Dismissed

A. Xavier v. State Bank of Travancore

Kerala HC1 Jun 2012RP/433/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition disposed dismissing review as no error apparent on face of judgment regarding banking claim.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2012/11TH JYAISHTA 1934

RP.No. 433 of 2012 () IN OPDRT/1135/2012

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPDRT.1135/2012 DATED 28-3-2012.

REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

A.X. XAVIER AJANTHA HOUSE, PULLUVILA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAMNOW RESIDING AT 4/294 PANATHIMMA JUNCTION,P.O.KANJIRAMKULAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SMT.K.P.SANTHI

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE

POOVAR BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
A.X. XAVIER
respondent
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE
respondent
THE RECOVERY OFFICER
respondent
STATE OF KERALA

Coram

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 1 Jun 2012 · June
Registered: 23 May 2012
Case no.: RP/433/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Antony Dominic

Dr.Ambedkar Cultural Forum Vs Corporation of Cochin
30 May 2012
S.Kannan Vs the Kerala State Pollution Control Board
30 May 2012
Padma Kumari Vs Eloor Municipality
30 May 2012
M/S. Shwas Homes Pvt. Ltd. Vs T.K. Sanalkumar
1 Jun 2012

Cite this judgement

A. Xavier v. State Bank of Travancore, RP/433/2012 (KL), decided on 1 June 2012.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

ANTONY DOMINIC

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review Petition dismissed. No error apparent on face of judgment warranting interference. Clarified that entitlement to benefits under Government Order remains unaffected.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

BHASURAM COMPLEX, POOVAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER

OFFICE OF THE RECOVERY OFFICER

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, 8TH FLOOR, K.S.H.B. BUILDING,

PANAMPILLY NAGAR,COCHIN - 682 036.

3. STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

FISHING AND HARBOUR (B) DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

RP.No. 433 of 2012 () IN OPDRT/1135/2012

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :-

ANNEXURE 1 : TRUE COPY OF G.O.NO.42/2007/F&HE DATED 2-11-2007. ANNEXURE 2 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21-2-2009 OF GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A TO JUDGE

amk

ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

--------------------------------------------------

RP.NO.433/2012 IN OP(DRT).No.1135/2012

--------------------------------------------------

Dated this the Ist day of June, 2012

O R D E R

Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents. Review of the judgment in OP(DRT). No.1135/2012 is sought for. On the grounds pleaded I am not persuaded to think that there is any error apparent on the face of the judgment warranting interference. Be that as it may it is clarified that if the petitioner is entitled to any benefit under any law or Government Order, the judgment will not stand in his way in claiming such benefits.

Review Petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE

vi/

WPC.No.

:2 :

AI extract

ANTONY DOMINIC

CNR

KLHC010362042012

Bench

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

Thomas.a.E Vs Angel Mary.a

1 Jun 2012

P.a.Subair Vs the Changanassery Municipality

1 Jun 2012