Shaji.K v. Rejula.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a review petition challenging an order that set aside an ex parte divorce decree and imposed maintenance conditions on the appellant-husband, finding no error on the face of the record.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed in limine.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/8TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
RP.No. 1139 of 2012 () IN MA/500/2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN MA.500/2011 DATED 4.8.2011
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
SHAJI.K, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN, SHYAMALA BHAVAN, ARUVIKUZHY P.O., ANICKADU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, BHUVANESWARAN, S/O.VIKRAMAN, KATTUNGAL VELI (H), PARAVOOR P.O, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEKUTTY MATHEW
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court committed an error in setting aside the ex parte decree of divorce and directing maintenance conditions.
Whether the grounds for the maintenance condition and costs expense passable when the wife was employed as a teacher.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shaji. K
- respondent
Rajula S. Bharathan
Coram
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court