K.Shameena v. a.a.Rasheed
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala modified an order regarding visitation rights for the father of a minor child, restricting visits to the petitioner's residence on specific Saturdays.
What did the court decide?
Modifying an order to confine visitation rights to the petitioner's house on every second evening.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/7TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
OP (FC).No. 3951 of 2012 (R) ---------------------------IA.NO.116/2012 IN OP.170/2011 of FAMILY COURT, KALPETTA
PETITIONER(S):
K.SHAMEENA, D/O. ANTHRU, KANDYAN HOUSE, PADINHARATHARA POST VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.P.V.SOBHANA SMT.V.BEENA SMT.K.V.SUPRABHA
RESPONDENT(S):
A.A.RASHEED S/O. AMMED, ATTASHERY HOUSE, KARIMKUTTY POST KOTTATHARA VILLAGE, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD-673 576.
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the venue of the visitation right over the minor child should be modified.
Whether the frequency and duration of visitation rights over the minor child should be restricted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. SHAMEENA
- respondent
A.A. RASHEED
Coram
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court