Fareeda v. Shihab
Case brief
What is this about?
This Original Petition under Article 227 challenged Family Court orders rejecting an impleadment application. The High Court held that the challenged orders were not perverse or illegal, thus refusing to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
The appeal against the Family Court orders was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/3RD ASWINA 1934 OP (FC).No. 371 of 2011 (R) ---------------------------
PETITIONER(S): -------------
FAREEDA KASIM, W/O.NAMBIPUNNILATH SHIHAB, NILAMPATHI PADIYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN SMT.BHAMA G. NAIR SRI.N.M.SIYAD SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
SHIHAB NAMBIPUNNILATH, NILAMPATHI, PADIYOOR THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 695.
BY ADV. SRI.N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(FC).371/20122
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court can correct the Family Court order dismissing impleadment applications under Article 227 jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Fareeda Kasim
- respondent
Shihab Nambipunnilath
Coram
Pius C. Kuriakose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court