The High Court directed the subordinate court to conclude pending civil proceedings within two months, ensuring injunction orders are implemented before evidence recording.
Directed the court below to conclude proceedings within two months from receipt of this judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/27TH ASWINA 1934 OP(C).No. 451 of 2012 (O) ------------------------(OS.464/2009 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, TRIVANDRUM)
PETITIONER:
M.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 70 YEARS S/O.MADHAVAN, RESIDING AT C-44/950, KALOOR P.O. COCHIN-682017. BY ADVS.SRI.T.U. ZIYAD SRI. SAJEEV.T.P. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
RESPONDENT: ----------S.K.JAYACHANDRAN S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, KUNJU VEEDU, T.C.V/2292 JAWAHAR NAGAR P.O., NEAR KADAPATHALA LANE PIPPINMOODU, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.V.PREMAKUMARAN NAIR R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C).No. 451 of 2012 (O)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT-P10.JUDGMENT DATED 08.4.2010 IN W.P.(C) 10795/2010 (O).
EXHIBIT-P11.TRUE COPY OF AFFIDAVIT DATED 01.06.2010 FILED BY RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P12.TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 07.06.2010 IN I.A.331/2010.
EXHIBIT-P16.ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER'S DEPOSITION DATED 10.11.2010.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
-2-
// TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Scl.
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
O.P.(C) No. 451 of 2012
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 19th day of October, 2012
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner complains that there is a tardy progress in the Court of the Munsiff of Thiruvananthapuram in O.S No.464/2009. The petitioner contends that I.A No.5774/2009 filed to enforce the order of injunction in I.A No.2314/2009 is not being given effect to.
The Original Petition (Civil) is disposed of.
smm
V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court below must expeditiously conclude pending civil proceedings following this Court's previous judgments?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P(C) Nos.10795/2010 and 20056/2010Referred¶44
M.RAVEENDRAN
S.K.JAYACHANDRAN
CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
CHITAMBARESH
Parties & counsel
