State of Kerala v. a.Y.Abraham
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What did the court decide?
The impugned order is affirmed subject to a clarification that no site inspection for metamorphic rock is necessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/12TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
OP(C).No. 3294 of 2012 (O)
OP(A).5/1996 of PRL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER(S):
- STATE OF KERALA
- REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
- K.I. P CIRCLE, KOLLAM
BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
RESPONDENT(S):
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
STATE OF KERALA
- petitioner
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
- respondent
A.Y. ABRAHAM
- respondent
THANKAMMA ABRAHAM
- respondent
SELINE RAJAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court