Vinod Anand v. Jyothi Seetharaman
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of three matrimonial appeals based on a settlement agreement between the parties. Appeals regarding money and gold recovery were dismissed as settled. The divorce decree challenge was dismissed upholding the divorce. Property attachments were ordered lifted.
What did the court decide?
Appeals 380/11 and 381/11 disposed of upon full satisfaction and modification of decrees per settlement. Appeal 399/11 dismissed confirming divorce. Property attachments lifted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/25TH JYAISHTA 1934S
Mat.Appeal.No. 380 of 2011 ( )
OPOS.288/2008 of FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT IN THE MAT.APPEALS:
VINOD ANAND, S/O.A.V.SHENOY, HOUSE VIII/150 ,COCHIN 682 002 NOW RESIDING AT FLAT NO.5, KONARK HSG.SOC NR GANESH TEMPLE, AUNDH-KHADAKI ROAD, PUNE 411 020.
BY ADV. SMT.MARY BEENA JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S):
JYOTHI SEETHARAMAN D/O. DR. K.N.SEETHARAMAN, NAIMISHARANYA A.N.PURAM EAST, 688 001, ALAPPUZHA REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR.K.N.SEETHARAMAN, S/O.NARASIMHA NAICK OF -DO- -DO-
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY [CAVEATOR]
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Mat. Appeal Nos. 380/11 and 381/11 regarding recovery of money and gold ornaments should be allowed in view of the settlement.
Whether Mat. Appeal No. 399/11 challenging the divorce decree should be dismissed.
Whether the attachment of immovable property belonging to the appellant should be lifted as part of the settlement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VINOD ANAND
- respondent
JYOTHI SEETHARAMAN
Coram
K.T.SANKARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court