Narayanan v. Sindhu
Case brief
What is this about?
This matrimonial appeal was dismissed because the appellants contended the dispute was settled outside the court. The bench closed the appeal without examining the merits of the grounds raised.
What did the court decide?
Appeal closed without examining merits; no further relief.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/9TH ASWINA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 126 of 2011 (A)
OP.400/2009 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT 1 & 2 IN O.P. APPELLANT NO.2 DIED AFTER JUDGMENT. ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 3 TO 7 ARE THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED APPELLANT NO. 2
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN O.P.
- NARAYANAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.CHANDU, PATTAYIL HOUSE, MATTANI, VALLIKUNNU P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
- CHANDU, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.VAVUNNI, PATTAYIL HOUSE, MATTANI, VALLIKUNNU P.O. (DIED) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
NARAYANAN
- appellant
CHANDU
- appellant
LAKSHMI
- appellant
DEVAN
- appellant
BAHVUNNI
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court