Gopakumar v. Moorthi.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant was absent and unprepared to argue the motor accident claims appeal. The High Court ordered the appeal to be closed without examining its merits.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is closed without examining the merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/22ND PHALGUNA 1933
MACA.No. 1291 of 2006 ( )
OP (MV).941/2001 of MACT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT/APPLICANT::
GOPAKUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. APPU PANICKER, KIZHAKE VARUVILAKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, OOKKODU, VAPANIYOOR DESOM KALLIYOOR VILLAGE, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS::
1. MOORTHI P., S/O.PONNAIAH THEVAR, HOUSE NO.10/43, PERUNAZHI BUS STAND,PERUNAZHI P.O. KUMUTHI, RAMNADU DISTRICT, TAMILNADU.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GOPAKUMAR
- respondent
MOORTHI P.
- respondent
VADIVELU
- respondent
BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court