The High Court of Kerala allowed an appeal against the Special Tahsildar. Dismissing the opposing appeal by the Government, the court relied on reasons stated in a separate judgment wherein the claimant's appeal was already granted.
Decision to allow the appeal preferred by the claimant and dismiss the appeal preferred by the Government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2012/1ST CHAITHRA 1934
L.A.A.No.75 of 2012 (C)
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN LAR.38/2006 of SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA).
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT IN L.A.R:
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A NO.I, KOLLAM.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAM KUMAR,
SRI.P.C.IYPE, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL
RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT IN L.A.R:
RAJESWARI AMMA, USHA MANDIRAM, PULAMON, MYLOM - 691 531.
BY ADV.SRI.T.K.MARTHANDAN UNNITHAN.
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & A. V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ.
LAA No. 75 of 2012.
Dated this the 21st day of March, 2012.
JUDGMENT
Pius C. Kuriakose, J .
We are today allowing the appeal preferred by the claimant
against the same impugned decree by a separate judgment. In view
of reasons stated in that judgment, we dismiss the appeal preferred by
the Government.
s d/-
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE
s d/-
A. V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
krj
The Special Tahsildar
Rajeswari Amma
Usha Mandiram
Pius C. Kuriakose
A. V. Ramakrishna Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
