In this land acquisition appeal, the Kerela High Court held the matter surplusage based on a prior judgment and rejected the appeal filed by the Vadakara Municipality.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2012/3RD CHAITHRA 1934 LA.App..No. 584 of 2008 ( ) --------------------------LAR.25/2003 of SUB COURT, VADAKARA APPELLANT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT: ---------------------------
STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KOYILANDY. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER C.R.SYAMKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANTS & 2ND RESPONDENT:
ATTORNEY HOLDER, RESPONDENT NO.2 K.P.AMMU AMMA
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2303-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ.
LAA. No. 584 of 2008
Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
In view of the judgment of this Court in LAA. No. 347
of 2007, an appeal filed by the requisitioning authority Vadakara Municipality, we hold that this appeal is surplusage. This appeal is rejected.
(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)
(A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE)
ksv/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
LAA. No. 347 of 2007Referred¶26
VADAKARA MUNICIPALITY
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KOYILANDY
RAYARAPPAN NAIR
K.P. AMMU AMMA
K.P. PRABHAKARAN
K.P. GEETHA
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
