Xavier M.Lukose v. Joseph M.Lukose
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court affirmed the interim order of the Sub Court impleading legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff in a civil suit supported by POA affidavits, reserving the final decision on the validity of the application for later.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/18TH KARTHIKA 1934
CRP.No. 477 of 2012 ()
I.A.NO.294/2012 IN OS.411/2010 of SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/COUNTER PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:
XAVIER M.LUKOSE, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.CHACKO LUKOSE, RESIDING AT MALIAMPURACKAL, PUNNAKUNNATHUSSERY MURI, CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, PULINCUNNU, ALAPPUZHA-688 504.
BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS 2 AND 3:
1. JOSEPH M.LUKOSE,S/O.CHACKO LUKOSE,AGED 69 YEARS,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an interim order impleading heirs of a deceased plaintiff is correct when the POA holder was authorised by the original plaintiffs only.
Whether grounds exist to entertain a civil revision petition regarding an interim order before the merits of the impleading application are adjudicated.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Xavier M. Lukose
- respondent
Joseph M. Lukose (reps. P.J. Shibu)
- respondent
Alexander Lukose (reps. P.J. Shibu)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court