Rathan v. Radha
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petitions challenging a lower court order that allowed condonation of 698 days delay and set aside an ex-parte decree in a specific performance suit were dismissed by the High Court, finding no jurisdictional error.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petitions C.R.P.Nos. 315 & 345 of 2012 failed and were dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/11TH ASWINA 1934
CRP.No. 315 of 2012 ()
IA.NO.2948/2012 IN OS.178/2008 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PARAVUR
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
RATHAN, AGED 57 YEARS S/O. LAKSHMANAN, KANAKKATTUSSERY, CHERAI.P.O. PIN-683514.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR
SRI.P.VISWANATHAN
RESPONDENT(S)/ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT NOS. 3 TO 6 AND DEFENDANT NO.2:
- RADHA, AGED 47 YEARS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the lower court's order condoning 698 days delay to set aside an ex-parte decree in a specific performance suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rathan
- respondent
Radha
- respondent
Vijayamary
- respondent
Honey Mol
- respondent
Biju
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court