Sudhakaran v. Sasi Nadar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil revision petition regarding a suit for construction of a compound wall, the High Court of Kerala clarified the location of the wall and allocated construction expenses between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners to pay Rs. 2,000; respondents to bear remaining expenses; Advocate Commissioner to fix location.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/9TH KARTHIKA 1934
CRP.No. 6 of 2012 ()
OS.1558 of 2001 of I ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, TRIVANDRUM
REVISION PETITIONER(S):
- SUDHAKARAN
- S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, KARIKUZHI VEEDU, NENNIYOOR
- THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- SURENDRAN,
- S/O.GOVINDAN, KARIKUZHI VEEDU, VENNIYOOR THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADVS.SRI.G.P.SHINOD
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the expenses for the construction of the compound wall should be borne solely by the respondents or shared with the defendants.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sudhakaran
- petitioner
Surentran
- respondent
Sasi Nadar
- respondent
Valsala Kumari
- respondent
Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court