Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Alex Vs v.P.Behnan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2012)

Home
Kerala HC
2012
Alex Vs v.P.BehnanAlex v. v.P.Behnan

Disposed

Alex v. v.P.Behnan

Kerala HC14 Dec 2012CRP/141/2012

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/23RD AGRAHAYANA 1934

CRP.No. 141 of 2012

OS.415/1990 of ADDL.SUB COURT,PARAVUR

REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DECREE HO:

ALEX

S/O PAULOSE, PATTALATTUVEETTIL, ARAKKAPPADY VILLAGE PERUMBAVOOR.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.NARAYANAN (PARUR) SRI.ALUNKAL GEORGE

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTOR.:

1. V.P.BEHNAN

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Alex
respondent
V.P. Behnan
respondent
Paul Issac

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 14 Dec 2012 · December
Registered: 22 Mar 2012
Case no.: CRP/141/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V.chitambaresh

Nirmala Vs Vijayaraj
13 Dec 2012
T.Ali Vs M/S.India Garments Capital and Finance Limited
13 Dec 2012
M.U. Kuriakose Vs K.J. John
13 Dec 2012
Vijayan Vs Lakshimi .M.
14 Dec 2012
Reghu M. Vs Rajavally

Cite this judgement

Alex v. v.P.Behnan, CRP/141/2012 (KL), decided on 14 December 2012.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. CHITAMBARESH

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

S/O PAILY, VATTEKKATTU VEETTIL, VENGOLA

PERUMBAVOOR, PIN-683 542.

2. PAUL ISSAC,

S/O. ISSAC, KUZHUKKATTUKUNNEL, VENGOLA WEST VILLAGE

PERUMBAVOOR, PIN-683 542.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN

THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 1412-2012, ALONG WITH CRP. 227/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

C.R.P.Nos. 141 and 227 of 2012

Dated this the 14^th day of December, 2012

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of in terms of

the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Kerala State Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Needless to say that the terms of the settlement will be part of the order disposing of the Civil Revision Petitions.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.

V. CHITAMBARESH

CNR

KLHC010198972012

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

14 Dec 2012

K.M.Jose Vs M.a.Ubaid

14 Dec 2012