The Kerala High Court permitted the criminal revision petitioner to withdraw the petition without prejudice to future trial contentions and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw without prejudice granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/13TH ASWINA 1934
Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 2109 of 2012 ()
------------------------------CMP.NO.630A/2010 IN ST NO.2555/2009 of J.M.F.C.,VARKALA
REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
MOHANACHANDRAN NAIR S/O. JANARDHANAN PILLAI, UJJAINI, NEAR GUEST HOUSE JANARDANAPURAM, VARKALA BY ADV. SRI. R. ANILKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
1. RAKESH
2. STATE OF KERALA
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sp
SIRI JAGAN, J.
Crl. R.P. No:2109/2012
Dated this the 5th day of October, 2012.
O R D E R
After arguing for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl. Revision Petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise the contention now raised during the trial of the criminal case. Permission granted and the Crl. Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in the above liberty.
S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE
sp
MOHANACHANDRAN NAIR S/O. JANARDHANAN PILLAI
RAKESH
STATE OF KERALA
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
