Jeeja Bai v. P.Mohanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act allowed after settlement between parties; accused acquitted and proceedings disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner acquitted; Criminal Appeal and Revision petition disposed of; parties permitted to compound the offence.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/23RD AGRAHAYANA 1934
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1197 of 2012 ()
CRA.75/2012 of ADDL.D.C.(SPL.COURT FOR TRIAL FOR MARADU CASES)KOZ ST.2945/2009 of J.M.F.C.-I,KOZHIKODE
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
JEEJA BAI, AGED 56 YEARS W/O.DASAN, SAUBHAGYAM HOUSE, KANNANKARA (PO) CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.SREEJITH
SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR
COMPLAINANT(S):
1. P.MOHANAN S/O.PERAVAKUTTY, PURATHATTERY HOUSE, VENGERY (PO) KOZHIKODE-10.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
JEEJA BAI
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- other
P.MOHANAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court