Dismissed
Adil v. Daison Raj
Kerala HCCrl.Rev.Pet/1060/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petitioners accused in a criminal case withdrew prosecution. The High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn upon recordal of non-prosecution by petitioners.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT:
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
¶4
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2012/7TH JYAISHTA 1934
¶5
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1060 of 2012 ()
¶6
CMP.NO.1357/2012 IN CC.860/2009 of J.M.F.C.-IV,KOZHIKODE
¶7
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
¶8
- ADIL, AGED 22 YEARS
¶9
- S/O.ABDU KAREEM, “DREAMS”, 6TH GATE
¶10
- KOZHIKODE.
¶11
- SAHEER
¶12
- ABDUL KALAM, PARAMBATH HOUSE, RARICHAN ROAD
¶13
- KOZHIKODE.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Adil
- petitioner
Saheer
- respondent
Daison Raj
- respondent
Station House Officer Nadakkavu
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court