suspension from service. Suspension was challenged by the complainant before the University Tribunal, which passed orders to reinstate him in service, subject to the disciplinary proceedings initiated. Complaining noncompliance of that order he filed a contempt petition. When that petition came up for consideration, this court directed for reinstating him and adjourned the case to a date fixed for report. On the adjourned date, it was reported by the management that orders have been issued to appoint him as principal. However, the postal article sent to him later was only an envelope in blank, which did not contain any order of appointment, is the case of the complainant for filing the complaint to prosecute the manager. He opened the postal article sent by the management at the post office in the presence of the post man and it was found with no enclosure, is his case. Previously, complaint filed by him before the Magistrate raising allegations as above was referred to police for investigation and report under Section 156(3) of the Code. Police, after investigation, filed a refer report. Taking objection to such report, complainant preferred a protest complaint on which after taking the sworn statement of the complainant and examining the witnesses produced by
