also some other accused persons as well, once a settlement had been arrived at and that too deciding to severe the relationship between the spouses with returning of the valuables belonging to the wife, that should have given a quietus to all controversies which existed. The records produced by the petitioners would show that after settlement under Annexure A2 agreement, she had initiated proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act and also for claiming maintenance for the child from its father. No doubt, if she is entitled to seek the reliefs in such proceedings either for herself or on behalf of the child, she is fully competent to do so. However, with respect to vexing and harassing her husband and his relatives with a complaint imputing matrimonial cruelty, to proceed against them for the offence under Section 498A of the IPC, necessarily, the previous complaint filed by her before the police and its cessation on an agreement reached by the parties cannot be ignored where Annexure A2 agreement is not disputed, but, only the circumstance that she then was having an advanced pregnancy, that alone, is canvassed for to impeach the