C.Lalaji v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition to quash criminal proceedings was dismissed because the petitioner failed to serve notice on an impleaded respondent despite a prior court direction.
What did the court decide?
The petition was turned down and dismissed due to failure to serve notice on the impleaded respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/27TH ASWINA 1934
Crl.MC.No. 2402 of 2008 ( )
(TO QUASH ANNEXURE A-4 CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.16/2008 OF THADIYITTAPARAMBU POLICE STATION - NOW PENDING AS C.C.NO.545/248 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PERUMBAVOOR)
PETITIONER(S):
C.LALAJI, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, AGED 48 YEARS, SWAPNA NIVAS, THATHAMPALLY P.O, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition to quash criminal proceedings should be allowed when the petitioner failed to serve notice on an impleaded respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Lalaji
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
M.A. Ismail
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court