Padmini v. Sivasudhan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the criminal appeal by abating it because the respondent/accused was deceased at the time of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/12TH BHADRA 1934
CRL.A.No. 469 of 2004 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRLP.201/2004 DATED 17-03-2004 CC.177/2000 of J.M.F.C.-III,TRIVANDRUM
APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT::
PADMINI, W/O. KUMARAN NAIR, LEKSHMI GARDENS, KARIYAVATTOM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.MANU V.
RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED::
1. SIVASUDHAN, WORKER, ACID PLANTS
- (SECTION), TITANIUM PRODUCTS, KOCHUVELI P.O.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Padmini
- appellant
Sivasudhan
- appellant
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court