Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after multiple attempts to contact the appellant to provide instructions regarding curing defects failed.
The criminal appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/4TH ASWINA 1934
CRL.A.No. 1992 of 2005 (D )
CC.482/2004 of ADDL.C.J.M.(E&O),ERNAKULAM CRLP.668/2005 DATED 16-11-2005
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT.:
SHERRY MATHEW, AGED 48,
S/O.LATE MATHEW PHILIP, PUTHENVEETTIL HOUSE,34/749 A, THRIKKOVIL ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI-24.
BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/STATE & ACCUSED 1 & 2.:
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.S.HYMA
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
--------------------------------------------Crl.A.No.1992 of 2005
Dated this the 26th day of September, 2012
JUDGMENT
Adv.Smt.Santhy.M. submitted that though the appellant is contacted by sending a registered post and sought instruction to cure the defect, so far no instruction is received. The above submission of the learned counsel is recorded.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE
skj
SHERRY MATHEW
STATE OF KERALA
JOY THOMAS
V.K.MOHANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
