James Joseph v. Mr.Manoj
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court petition regarding compliance with prior directions was admitted. The court accepted that directions were complied with and closed the case without proceeding further.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/4TH PHALGUNA 1933
Con.Case(C).No. 74 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/34094/2010 ------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC.34094/2010 DATED 07-12-2011
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
JAMES JOSEPH, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.LATE P.C.JOSEPH, PARAPARAKATH HOUSE KANJIKULAM POST,MANNARGHAD (VIA) PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN WP(C).:
MR. K. MANOJ, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER FOREST RANGE OFFICER, MANNARGHAD RANGE, MANNARGHAD POST, PALAKKAD.
R BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED SHAFI. M
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
James Joseph
- respondent
Mr. K. Manoj
Coram
C.K. Abdul Rehim
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court