V.Surendran v. Nancy Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala acknowledged that the petitioner complied with directions issued in a prior writ petition and the contempt petition was closed. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
What did the court decide?
The contempt court case is closed as the petitioner has complied with the directions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/16TH JYAISHTA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 690 of 2012 (S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.23979/2011 DATED 02-09-2011
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS NO.2 AND 3 IN THE WP[C]:
1. V.SURENDRAN, AGED 51 YEARS G.A.S.I, HCN 1132, S/O.VELAYUDHAN ADOOR POLICE STATION, ADOOR PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, VENGAVILA VEEDU VENCHEMBU.P.O., KOLLAM.
2. P.G.VISWAMOHANLAL, AGED 45 YEARS G.A.S.I, HCN.1130, S/O.GOVINDAN OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA, 'SREEVISWAM' VELLIYARA.P.O, PLANKAMON, AYIROOR PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WP[C]:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.SURENDRAN
- petitioner
P.G.VISWAMOHANLAL
- respondent
NANCY JOSEPH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court