T.M.Prabhakaran v. Smt. Roopkala Jagath
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitioner moved to close the case as respondents claimed compliance with directions, subject to a pending writ appeal. The court recorded compliance and closed the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Closed the contempt case after recording that respondents complied with directions subject to pending appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/26TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1731 of 2012 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.6806/2006 DATED 24-01-2012
PETITIONER/PETIONER IN W.P.(C):
T.M.PRABHAKARAN, AGED 68 YEARS
AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.T.S.MADHAVAN, THODANGAL HOUSE, P.O.ELTHURUTH, THRISSUR - 680 611.
BY ADVS.SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.) SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SMT. ROOPKALA JAGATH AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, SECRETARY KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.M.PRABHAKARAN
- respondent
SMT. ROOPKALA JAGATH AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.KRISHNAN NAIR
- respondent
SHRI. SATHYADAAS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court