Mathew A.T. v. S. Roopkala Jagath
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case was closed as the petitioners conceded that the directions were complied with. The court declared the matter closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/21ST AGRAHAYANA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1633 of 2012 (S) IN WPC.7460/2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.7460/2012
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BORAD RESIDING AT AYKATTUKUNNEL, VENNIKULAM,
PATHANAMTHITTA DIST
(PPO NO 27468)
RESIDING AT KODENVILAYIL KUDASSANADU P.O.,ALAPPUZHA DIST,(PPO NO 33658)
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ
RESPONDENT(S):
S. ROOPAKALA JAGATH, AGED 52 YEARS SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM POST OFFICE TRIVANDRUM - 695004
R BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 1633 of 2012
Dated this the 12th day of December, 2012
J U D G M E N T
It is conceded that the directions in the judgment have
been complied with. The contempt case is hence closed.
V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
A.T.Matthew, C.P.Jayalekshmy Kunjamma
S. Roopakala Jagath
V.Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court