P.G.Raghavan Pillai v. P.J.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order closing a contempt case after the petitioner was informed of a rejection order; remedy to challenge remains open.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed.
Single-line order closing a contempt case after the petitioner was informed of a rejection order; remedy to challenge remains open.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/19TH BHADRA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1293 of 2012 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12281/2012 DATED 31-05-2012
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
P.G.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDA PILLAI, PAINGATTAZHYKATHU VEEDU, NADUVILE MURI, CHATHAKULAM POST, PORUVAZHI, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
P.J.THOMAS
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM-691001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MJL
Con.Case(C).No. 1293 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE - I : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.5.2012 IN W.P.(C) 12281/2012
ANNEXURE -II : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6.7.2012 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P A TO JUDGE
MJL
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
------------------------------------------Contempt Case (C) No.1293 OF 2012
Dated this the 10th day of September, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent
to the filing of the Contempt Case, the petitioner has been
communicated with an order but rejecting the reliefs sought for.
Leaving open the remedy of the petitioner to challenge the
said order, this Contempt Case is closed.
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE
smp
P.G. Raghavan Pillai
P.J. Thomas
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court