Disposed
G.Sukumaran Nair, Nair Service Society v. M.Sivasankar
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1033/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/11TH KARTHIKA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 1033 of 2012 (S) -------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.29383/2011 DATED 05-06-2012
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P(C)NO.29383/2011:
G.SUKUMARAN NAIR, S/O.GOPALAN NAIR, AGED 70 YEARS, GENERAL SECRETARY, NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, HEAD OFFICE, PERUNNA, CHANGANACHERRY-686 102.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.P.BIJIMON
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P(C).NO.29383/2011:
M.SIVASANKAR, SON OF & AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO KERALA GOVT., GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL BY ADV.SRI.T.T.MOHAMOOD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS
Con.Case(C).No. 1033 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANN.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5/6/2012 IN I.A.NO.5789/2012 IN WPC.NO.29383/2012.
ANN.2: COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 6/6/2012 BY RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE:
ANN.R1(A): COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.294/12/G.EDN DATED 20/9/2012.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
AS
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No. 1033 of 2012
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2012
O R D E R
The counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fresh order Annexure R1 (a) issued, the grievance of the petitioner in the contempt of court case has been redressed for the present. In the above circumstances, the contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again, if necessity arises.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE
//True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
shg/
G.SUKUMARAN NAIR
M.SIVASANKAR
S. SIRI JAGAN
OTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court