Allowed

Rajesh @ Kunippan Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC13 Aug 2012Bail Appl./5528/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, the 6th accused charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code involving an unlawful assembly causing attempted murder, subject to conditions including a bail bond, appearance before the Investigating Officer, and prohibition from leaving Kerala.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on 18.8.2012, subject to conditions: bond execution, appearance before IO, prohibition on leaving Kerala, and non-interference with witnesses.

Rajesh @ Kunippan Rajesh Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/22ND SRAVANA 1934

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5528 of 2012 ()

¶6

-----------------------------CMP.1888/2012 of J.M.F.C.-I, PEERUMEDU CRIME NO.429/2012 OF PEERMADE POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONER/6TH ACCUSED :-

¶8

RAJESH @ KUNIPPAN RAJESH,, AGED 22 YEARS S/O.RAJU,PUTHIYA VEETTIL,CHEMMANNU PUTHUVAYAL ELAPPARA VILLAGE,IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM

¶10

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :-

¶11

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PEERUMEDU POLICE STATION IDUKKI THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKALAM.

¶12

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH V.S.

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-08-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

jvt

¶15

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

¶16

B.A. No.5528 of 2012

¶17

Dated this the 13^th day of August 2012

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Petitioner is the 6^th accused in Crime No.429/2012 of Peermade Police Station, Idukki District. The offences alleged against him and other accused are under Secs.143, 147, 148, 341, 307 and 427 r/w 149 IPC. Petitioner has been in custody from 25.7.2012 onwards.

¶20

It is alleged that this petitioner along with other accused persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of that unlawful assembly to cause the murder of the victim, attacked him with deadly weapons and caused serious injuries.

¶21

Considering the period of detention already undergone by the petitioner and in view of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that he will abide by any

¶22

B.A. No.5528 of 2012

¶23

-: 2 :-

¶24

condition that may be imposed on him, the petitioner is granted bail with effect from 18.8.2012 subject to the following conditions:

¶25

a. The accused shall execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties.

¶26

b. The accused shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and that he should appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders.

¶27

c. The accused shall produce his original passport before the learned Magistrate. If he is not having any valid passport, he should file an affidavit regarding the

¶28

B.A. No.5528 of 2012

¶29

-: 3 :-

¶30

same before the Magistrate.

¶31

d. The accused will also file affidavit that he

¶32

will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that he will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and that he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶33

e. The accused shall not leave the State of Kerala without permission of the court.

¶34

f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc.

¶35

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,

¶36

JUDGE.

¶37

Jvt

Rajesh @ Kunippan Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh @ Kunippan Rajesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nadukkandiyil Mahamood Vs State of Kerala

Jamalu.K.v. Vs State of Kerala

Chandrika Vs State of Kerala

Manoj Vs State of Kerala

A.Sumathi Vs the State of Kerala

Nidhin Vs State