T.Ambika v. Kseb
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition sought regularization of the petitioner's service and payment of pensionary benefits. The high court disposed of the petition by directing the second respondent to consider a specific representation and pass appropriate orders within three months.
What did the court decide?
The second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 and pass appropriate orders within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 9611 of 2011(B)
-------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------------
T.AMBIKA, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O. RAJU, TC 21/803, MANGATTUKONAM PUTHEN VEEDU, KARAMANA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI
SRI.R.SREEHARI
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of service as a Binder with consequential benefits.
Whether appropriate directions can be issued to the respondents to consider representations and pass orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.AMBIKA, W/O. RAJU
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
- respondent
THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
- respondent
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (G) HRM, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court