The writ petition was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. The court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds that it was not pressed.
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933
WP(C).No. 7534 of 2011(N)
-------- -------------------------
PETITIONERS:
---------------
ASOKAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 62, KORAMPARA KARA, POOPARA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI. LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM-685613.
2. TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, UDAMBANCHOLA TALUK, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685553.
3. VILLAGE OFFICER, POOPARA VILLAGE, POOPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685619.
4. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, DEVIKULAM, 685613.
5. RANGE OFFICER, DEVIKULAM FOREST RANGE OFFICE, DEVIKULAM-685613.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENNY VARGHESE.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SCL.
WP(C).No. 7534 of 2011(I)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
| EXT.P1: | TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SPL. DY. TAHASILDAR (CS), NEDUMKANDAM. |
|---|---|
| EXT.P2: | TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.4.1997. |
| EXT.P3: | TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE TALUK SURVEYOR. |
| EXT. P4: | TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 23.4.1997. |
| EXT. P5: | TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P6: | TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15.11.2010. |
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
SCL.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
W.P(C) No. 7534 of 2011
Dated this the 30th day of September , 2011.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition is not pressed. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
Rkc
//True copy//
PA to Judge
ASOKAN, S/O.KRISHNAN
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM-685613
TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, UDAMBANCHOLA TALUK, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685553
VILLAGE OFFICER, POOPARA VILLAGE, POOPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, DEVIKULAM
RANGE OFFICER, DEVIKULAM FOREST RANGE OFFICE
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
