This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2011 / 11TH ASWINA 1933
WP(C).No. 27846 of 2006(M)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
P.K.MOHANAKUMARAN NAIR, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES OFFICE, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI ADV.SMT. SABINA JAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. THE KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. S.DINAKARAN, PROJECT OFFICER, DISTRICT OFFICE, KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES, ALAPPUZHA.
3. KOYAKUTTY PROJECT OFFICER, DISTRICT OFFICE, KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES, THRISSUR.
4. AYISHABEEVI, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, DISTRICT OFFICE, KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES, ALAPPUZHA.
5. LAILANBEEVI, PROJECT OFFICER, DISTRICT OFFICE KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES, PATHANAMTHITTA.
R1 ADV. V.V.JOSHY R2 ADV. SRI.K.ANAND (A.201) R3 & R4 ADV.V.A. MUHAMMED
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON / / , THE COURT ON 03/10/2011 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MM
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.27846 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE
//True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
shg/
P.K.Mohanakumaran Nair
The Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board
S.Dinakaran
Koyakutty Project Officer
Ayishabeevi
Lailanbeeви
S斯里 Jagan Monday
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
