The petition was not pressed by its counsel. The Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
Dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 12TH MAGHA 1932
WP(C).No. 2194 of 2009(J)
--------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------
C.K. RADHADEVI @ PONNAMMA, KUMBUCKAL VEETTIL, CHERUVALLY VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.A.ANILKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, CHERUVALLY.
5. SREEDHARAN, S/O. GOURI, KUMBUCKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU R5 BY ADVS. SRI.TITUS MANI VETTOM, SRI.SOORAJ SUKUMARAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
W.P.(C) No. 2194 of 2009 J
Dated this the 1st day of February, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that he is not pressing the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge
C.K. RADHADEVI @ PONNAMMA
STATE OF KERALA
SREEDHARAN
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
