Allowed
M.a.Seena Ashraf v. the Tahsildar, Kunnathunadu and Others
Kerala HCWP(C)/20282/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mutation of property but was refused due to pending revenue recovery proceedings. Court relied on precedent holding that such pendency is not a valid bar. Quashed refusal and directed first respondent to effect mutation without delay.
What did the court decide?
Ext.P3 order declined so far as it refused mutation is quashed; first respondent directed to effect mutation as sought by petitioner without delay.