Anita Jacob v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 14062 of 2006(Y) ----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S): -------------------------
ANITA JACOB, AGED 43 YEARS, D/O. JACOB (LATE), SECTION OFFICER, COIR BOARD, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 016, RESIDING AT PALATHINKAL HOUSE, VATARATH ROAD, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-28.
BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JNANASEKHARAN
RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY, DEPARTMENT OF SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES AND AGRO AND RURAL INDUSTRIES, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. THE COIR BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 016.
3. SMT. P.KAIRALI, SECTION OFFICER, COIR BOARD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 16.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANITA JACOB
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE COIR BOARD
- respondent
SMT. P.KAIRALI
- respondent
CHAIRMAN, D.P.C. FOR PROMOTION TO THE POST OF MARKETING AND PUBLICITY OFFICER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court