G.Suresh Kumar v. the Commissioner of Excise
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 10622 of 2006(M)
----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
G.SURESH KUMAR, LEELA MANDIRAM, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM.
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
W.P(C).No.10622 of 2006
==================
Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition
has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
G.SURESH KUMAR
LEELA MANDIRAM
THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE
THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court