The High Court of Kerala dismissed the connected writ petitions as infructuous, holding that the matter had lost its significance or purpose by the time of hearing.
The writ petitions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933
WP(C).No. 10263 of 2005(V)
-------------------------PETITIONER(S): --------------1. SUSEELA, W/O.KUMARAN C., KOLAVATTAM KUNIYIL HOUSE, KURIKKOLAD, P.O.VATAKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K.
RESPONDENT(S):
SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA FOR R1 & 2
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/09/2011, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 17830 OF 2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
W.P(C).NO.10263 OF 2005 & W.P(C).NO.17830 OF 2005
Dated this the 30th day of September, 2011.
JUDGMENT
Both the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that
the writ petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly,
the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
cl
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
SUSEELA
GANGADHARAN P.
P.A.SIVARAMAN
VALSAN
T.K.RAMACHANDRAN
BALAKRISHNAN T.K.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
