Dismissed
Cini Singh v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCST.Rev./68/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933
ST.Rev..No. 68 OF 2011()
-----------------------TA.177/2010 OF STAT ADDL.BENCH, KOTTAYAM
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
CINI SINGH, M/S.SREENIVAS & CO. TIMBER DEALER, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
STATE OF KERALA.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED RAFEEQ
THIS SALES TAX REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
S.T.REV.. 68/2011
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE SALES TAX OFFICER-1, CHATHANNOOR. ANNEXURE-B COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE APPELLATE ASST. COMISSIONER, KOLLAM. ANNEXURE-C COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOTTAYAM.
// TRUE COPY //
P.S. TO JUDGE.
KNC/-
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ST.REV. 68 OF 2011
= = = = = = = = = = = =
DATED THIS, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Government Pleader, who took notice and argued the matter at admission stage. After hearing both sides, even though we find force in the contention of the petitioner that addition of 50% is on the higher side, we notice that the party has in the first place settled the entire liability under Amnesty Scheme. Further, the closure of business as claimed by the assessee is not seen proved before the lower authorities and in any case it is not followed by the cancellation of registration. Consequently, we do not find any merit in the S.T. Revision. It is accordingly dismissed.
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE).
P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE)
knc/-
Cini Singh
State of Kerala
C.N. Ramachandran Nair
P.S. Gopinathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court