Sulficker v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice C.K. Abdul Rehim allowed the review petition in a bank loan dispute. He recalled the previous judgment confirming an auction sale because the petitioner deposited the full bid amount while the successful bidder failed to deposit the balance.
What did the court decide?
Review petition allowed; the judgment dated 30.3.2011 in W.P.C. No. 35033 of 2010 is recalled.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933
RP.No. 326 of 2011 IN WPC.35033/2010
-------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35033/2010 Dated 30/03/2011 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
SULFICKER, S/O.MYTHEEN KANN, SULFICKER MANZIL, GANDHI NAGAR, ALAMCODE, PANGAPPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow review of a judgment confirming an auction sale when the petitioner deposited the full bid amount and sale was not yet confirmed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sulficker
- respondent
UCO Bank
- respondent
M/s. Srivindia Poly Films Private Ltd.
- respondent
Abdul Salam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court