K.Mohan Rajan v. Union of India & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a Writ petition challenging a mutual transfer order of a Diesel Technician. The court directed the respondent to confirm the transfer if mutually agreed or consider reposting the petitioner if no claimants exist upon the incumbent's retirement.
What did the court decide?
Directed the 3rd respondent to confirm the transfer if mutually requested or to consider reposting the petitioner if no other claimants exist on retirement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933
OP (CAT).No. 1925 of 2011(Z)
---------------------------OA.6/2011 of CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONER
--------------------
K.MOHAN RAJAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 53 YEARS, DIESEL TECHNICIAN, ALL INDIA RADIO, CALICUT, KERALA, PIN-673032.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR SMT.ANITHA MENON
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-110001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's challenge against transfer based on Recruitment Rules is tenable.
Whether the stay order should continue given the non-appearance of the substitute employee.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.MOHAN RAJAN
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, ALL INDIA RADIO
- respondent
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (SZ), ALL INDIA RADIO & TV
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court