Narayani v. Vasudevan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed O.P. challenging dismissal of applications to set aside an ex parte decree and condone delay in a suit regarding a gift deed. Held order non-appealable.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition dismissed as not maintainable.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2011 / 8TH MAGHA 1932
OP(C).No. 390 of 2011(O)
OS.1731/1996 OF II ADDL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER -----------------------------NARAYANI, KADAPPURATH HOUSE, AMBALLUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 315. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR
RESPONDENT:
--------------VASUDEVAN, KADAPPURATH HOUSE, PARIYARAM.P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM, TRISSUR-680 721.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
O.P.(C). NO. 390 OF 2011 O
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2011
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal can be filed under Order XLIII Rule 1(c) CPC against an order dismissing applications to set aside an ex parte decree and condone delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narayani
- respondent
Vasudevan
Coram
K.T. Sankaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court