This Court dismissed an appearing land acquisition appeal without costs because the government's issue was already covered by this Court's earlier judgments. No substantive hearing took place.
Appeal dismissed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2011 / 23RD POUSHA 1932
LA.App..No. 461 of 2004()
(LAR NO.325/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM)
APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT
STATE OF KERALA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN
RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS
ADV. SRI.RAJEEV V.KURUP FOR R1 & R2
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
L.A.A.No. 461 OF 2004
Dated this the 13th day of January, 2011
JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
It is brought to our notice that the issue raised by the Government in this appeal is covered against the Government by the judgment of this Court in L.A.A. Nos.1226/2002 & 1733/2002. Hence, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
dpk
State of Kerala
Gervasis
Mary
Pius C.Kuriakose
N.K.Balakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
