In a few-sentence order, the High Court dismissed the land acquisition appeal. The court relied on a separate judgment allowing the claimants' appeals, stating that the current appeal is thus no longer sustainable, without providing further substantive reasoning.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932
LA.App..No. 1337 of 2009(D)
(LAR NO.136/2007 OF THE PRL.SUB COURT, N.PARUR)
APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT
STATE OF KERALA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN
RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT
ADV. SRI.T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN FOR R
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
L.A.A.No.1337 OF 2009
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
We by separate judgment have allowed the appeals preferred by the claimants. In view of that judgment, this appeal
is dismissed.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
dpk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
STATE OF KERALA
MINIMOL
SHEEBA
ELIZABETH
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
