Sarojam v. Jayakesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge allowed an application seeking communication of a judgment and decree dated 04.10.2011 in LA.A. No. 1153 of 2010 to the Sub Registry Office and Village Office, Mussavikad, to facilitate transcription of ownership rights.
What did the court decide?
Communication of the judgment and decree dated 04.10.2011 to the Sub Registry, Ernakulam, and Village Office, Mulavukad.
What the court decided
IA/1/2021 IN LA.App. 1153/2010
1 / 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
Friday,the 9th day of April 2021/19th Chaithra, 1943 IA 1/2021 IN LA.App. 1153/2010
Against LAR No.184/2000 of the III ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM For information purpose only PETITIONER/APPELLANT
SAROJAM, AGED 84 YEARS, W/O.T.A.RETNA KUMARAN,THAIKKOTTATHIL HOUSE,
SRINJAPURAM,KODUNGALLOOR,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
- K.K. JAYAKESHAN ,(DIED)
KALLARICKAL HOUSE, PANAMPUKADU,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether IT is appropriate to communicate a judgment and decree to the Sub Registry Office and Village Office for transcription purposes.
Whether the Court can direct revenue authorities to effect mutation when the earlier judgment left mutation to be applied for by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAROJAM
- respondent
K.K. RAJU (S/O. LATE SRI. K.K. JAYAKESHAN)
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
REMA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court