The Kerala High Court, in C.R.P. No. 853 of 2007, dismissed a Civil Revision Petition. On the submission that the matter was settled in Lok Adalath, based on a letter from the District Collector, the court disposed of the petition.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as settled in Adalath.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 CRP.No. 853 of 2007() --------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18/10/206 IN E.P.NO.158/2003 IN LAR.143/1997 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): JUDGMENT DEBTOR
-----------------------------------------------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.SAJEEV
RESPONDENT(S): DECREE HOLDERS --------------------------------------------------ELEZABETH JOSE, W/O. JOSEPH, KUZHIRCHIYAYA KURUSUMOOTTIL HOUSE, NJEEZHOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
C.R.P.No.853 of 2007
Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011
O R D E R
Learned Government Pleader submitted that the
matter was settled in Lok Adalath. He made the submission on the basis of a letter issued by the District Collector, Kottayam. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as settled in Adalath.
K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE
csl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition ought to be dismissed as settled in Lok Adalath.
Rev. Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala, Rep. by the District Collector, Kottayam, Govt Pleader Sri. T.K. Sajeev
Elezabeth Jose, W/o. Joseph
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
