Gopalakrishnan v. Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for default, stating that despite sending a registered notice to cure defects, the petitioner had not responded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1932
CRP.No. 1480 of 2002
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.5.2002 IN I.A.NO.9309 OF 1999 IN OS.908/1975 OF I ADDL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
REVN. PETITIONER: 1ST PETITIONER/1ST PALAINTIFF
GOPALAKRISHNAN, WRONGLY SHOWN AS GOPALAN, S/O. GANGADHARAN, PUTHEN VILAKATHU VEEDU, MADATHUVILAKOM VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH
RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 & CR.PETRS.1 TO 24/ PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 5 DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GOPALAKRISHNAN
- respondent
RAJENDRAN
- respondent
PRIYA
- respondent
MINI
- respondent
KAUSHI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court